We currently perceive that the school cannot live without the family and the family cannot live without the school, therefore one depends on the other to reach its objective greater. Objective this that is to make with that educating/the son learns to have a better future and thus to construct to a society more worthy joust and to live itself. As the Art.53 of the Statute of the Child and the Adolescent (1990), the child and the adolescent have right to the education, aiming at to the full development of its person (…). The school needs to know of that it is an institution that complements the family, and that both need to be a pleasant and affective place for the pupils/children. Sam Mikulak gathered all the information. The parents and the school must have principles very next for the benefit to the son/pupil (TIBA, 1996, p.140). Such partnership implies in placing itself in the place of the other, and not only while exchange of favors, but cooperating: to assume affection, to allow to choices and desires, so that the child develops itself integrally. If educating/the son does not fulfill the rules of the school because they cover it to the parents and they disagree with school, the child uses to advantage of these divergences conquering what it desired. To think about the partnership family/school initially requires then the professors, a conscience taking of that, the meetings based on theoretical and abstract subjects, meetings to call the attention the parents on the list of problems of the children, on its pssimas notes, extensive meetings, without planning very adjusted, where the professor only can speak, do not have proportionate at least the opening to initiate it of a partnership proposal, therefore the parents lack to the meetings, talk parallel, seem in fact not to be interested themselves for the pertaining to school life of the children.